Thanks! You've successfully subscribed to the BONEZONE®/OMTEC® Monthly eNewsletter!

Please take a moment to tell us more about yourself and help us keep unwanted emails out of your inbox.

Choose one or more mailing lists:
BONEZONE/OMTEC Monthly eNewsletter
OMTEC Conference Updates
Advertising/Sponsorship Opportunities
Exhibiting Opportunities
* Indicates a required field.

3D Printing, Cybersecurity Emerging Concerns for Device Manufacturers

As if the industry isn’t saddled with enough rules and regulations, new technologies like additive manufacturing and the domination of digital communication and information transfer mean additional considerations for medical device manufacturers.

In a recent Medmarc webinar, Anthony Strasius, an attorney and regional managing partner at Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, discussed what he views as the top ten concerns for life sciences companies.

Should these top your list of priorities? No. In fact, some of these concerns might be integrated into your workflow already. As engineers and operations folks, though, it’s good to understand what regulators and legal teams are eyeing. We summarize three of these concerns below.

3D Medical Devices
Litigation risks surrounding 3D printing relate to the novelty of the technology and the changes that it brings to the manufacturing process.

“Are companies now going to be liable for the process as well as the product in different ways than they have in the past?” Strasius asks. “The short answer is likely to be yes.”

Thus, it’s critical to perform thorough testing of 3D-printed devices.

Aspects of cost may arise as well. As more companies employ 3D printing, manufacturers may be accused of rushing products to market to save money on this newer manufacturing process. 

Data Cybersecurity and Medical Device Hacks
Various potential risks are associated with cybersecurity, such as security and privacy vulnerabilities, as noted by FDA. The Agency released its guidance, "Content of Premarket Submissions for Management of Cybersecurity in Medical Devices,” in October 2014, recommending that manufacturers consider cybersecurity risks as part of the design and development process of a medical device, and submit documentation about risks and ways to mitigate those risks.

FDA recommends that companies:

    1. Identify threats and vulnerabilities.
    2. Assess the impact of those on device functionality and end users.
    3. Assess the likelihood of a threat or vulnerability to occur.
    4. Determine risk levels and suitable mitigation strategies.
    5. Assess residual risk and risk acceptance criteria.

Actual hacks on medical devices are difficult to detect and prevent. “To protect a medical device from hacks, read FDA’s guidance, evaluate your company risk, adopt the risk management framework that you need and enhance security by increasing security education and awareness,” Strasius says.